Re: info about hdds in raid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> John R Pierce wrote:
> > Les Mikesell wrote:
> >> If you can see activity lights, you can 'cat /dev/sd? >/dev/null' to
> >> make them busy, one at a time (where ? is a, b, c, etc).
> >>
> >
> > hahaha, I've done that, only my version is...
> >
> >     # dd if=/dev/sdX of=/dev/null bs=512
> >
> > but, same difference
>
> It's unfortunately about the best we've got when device names are
> assigned more or less randomly.  NICs are even worse - we need a command
> to make the lights blink there too.
>
> --
>   Les Mikesell@xxxxxxxxx
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Fully second that. The dd read test is the best way to tell which
drive is starting to fail. As soon as one does it is not a bad idea to
replace it.

Note that sometimes SMART drive and such technologies fail to detect
missing sectors even when the dd test stumples upon them.

Boris.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux