Re: Default ACL question (EXECUTE BIT)

["nate" <centos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jorge Fábregas wrote:

> I don't think umask is involved here.  As far as I know umask isn't
> involved
> when dealing with default ACL's.  Anyhow, I'm pretty sure this is by design
> (security-wise). Is there any way to override this behaviour?

It's been eons since I played with acls, but I thought you can
only view acls via getfacl(or other similar commands) ls -l doesn't
do anything to show acls, only unix-style permissions.


nate


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos