John R Pierce wrote:
>> It's my understanding that CentOS is a carbon copy of Red Hat - with
>> the exception of the art work. Assuming that this is true, the support
>> matrix for VMware Server 2.0.1 states Red Hat 5.1. I cannot seem to
>> locate a CentOS 5.1 x86-64 copy. I can get a copy of 5.3 and 5.4. If
>> I take this route, what should I expect running VMware 2.0.1?
>
> my experience with VMWare Server 2.0.x on x86_64 platforms is abysmal.
> its totally unstable and unusable, on both Linux (RHEL 5.x) and Windows
> Vista 64bit, even if you are just running 32bit VMs.
I don't like the change to a web based console in the 2.x series so I'm
still mostly using 1.x versions (and I've had some things running under
Centos 3.x/VMware 1.x for years with no issues). But, I hadn't seen any
real problems with the 2.0.1 version before the glibc change in the 5.4
upgrade. What kind of trouble did you have?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
