Karanbir Singh wrote:
> This is now normal, but it hasent been like this in the past. Over the
> last 8 months the updates for CentOS-5 have come from a mostly automated
> system and one of the fallouts is that this system will nominate and
> track update state on a few external mirrors before doing the metadata
> and announce[1]. This has worked flaw lessley in the past ( only
> sometimes when specific mirrors would orphan themselves would users
> reall 'see' this ). And ofcourse when we do things like OpenOffice (
> which pushes ~ 3 GB of updates ).
<SNIP>
Karanbir,
Thank you so much for taking the time to write that reply. Reading about
the process of pushing out updates gave me a new appreciation for what
you and the rest of "the team" does for me "the consumer".
Thank you, thank you, thank you,
Andy Hull
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
