On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Ian Murray <murrayie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You could be right. I didn't think they were but I'm not incredibly familiar with the entire rebuild process.
Matt
--
Mathew S. McCarrell
Clarkson University '10
mccarrms@xxxxxxxxx
mccarrms@xxxxxxxxxxxx
1-518-314-9214
As far as I remember, some subsequent RH updates are rolled-into the CentOS release. Someone more familiar with the build process may clarify that.
>The dates are likely based on when the ISO was actually created. Therefore, if the ISO was generated on Oct. 1st and no issues were found with it in QA, then the date you are seeing on the mirrors is correct. The ISOs are based on the original 5.4 tree and don't include updates that Red Hat released after the initial release of RHEL 5.4.
You could be right. I didn't think they were but I'm not incredibly familiar with the entire rebuild process.
Matt
--
Mathew S. McCarrell
Clarkson University '10
mccarrms@xxxxxxxxx
mccarrms@xxxxxxxxxxxx
1-518-314-9214
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
