On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> again, whether people are being paid to do any of this work is not
> relevant. it's important, from the perspective of reputation, that
> everyone see the centos project as being efficiently and competently
> run, and making what *appears* to be an announcement of completion and
> the beginning of syncing servers, followed by days of awkward silence
> and increasingly defensive rhetoric, is not the way to do it. it just
> looks bad.
Agreed. The best policy would be to simply say -- "It'll be done when
it's done." Of course they tried that originally, and that's wasn't
"acceptable" either.
Here's the way I'm going to take care of the "problem." Figure eight
weeks out for CentOS from the time Red Hat is released. If it gets
done quicker than that, I've got a bonus.!
--
RonB -- Using CentOS 5.3
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
