Re: Sparc?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



2009/10/16 Timo Schoeler <timo.schoeler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> thus Stephen Nelson-Smith spake:
> | Hi,
> |
> |> Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache,
> |> postfix, mysql, etc.
> |
> | Do you have a specific reason not to use Solaris?
> |
> | If you don't want to do that I've had excellent results with Debian on
> | Sparc, and NetBSD.
> |
> | S.
>
> IIRC there were (and maybe, still are) difficulties of Linux using the
> (P)MMU in SPARC(64) CPUs, resulting in performance hits. I'm not sure if
> it was fixed (during the years), though.

Not sure - I have some people I can ask.  I've not deployed a
Linux-on-Sparc64 machine that needed to be performant.  For blistering
speed NetBSD is the way to go - it's scary-fast.

S.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux