Bare Metal vs virtualization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Hello to all:

I know this list is generally Linux-only, but I figured I'd try to
gain wisdom from those with hard-core Windows needs, too.

I was recently pricing out a high-end desktop system for a user who
will doing a lot of CAD, Matlab, SolidWorks, and other apps that will
utilize a lot of number crunching and video.

The quote for the desktop (64-bit Vista is likely), which included 12
GB RAM, two 1 TB SATA hard drives, a high-end NVidia 3D video card,
and two Intel quad-core 3.3 Ghz processors, was about $15k.

An approval manager asked if the money could be better spent towards a
cluster for others to use.

This user's needs are for Windows-based apps.    The open question,
then, is can the results the user needs be derived from a high-end
Windows cluster or virtual environment that is multi-user capable and
runs Windows-based apps, or do they need bare metal for true results
and performance?   I awaiting an answer on this from the user.

In the meantime, for those who may have been faced with this, too,
what have you discovered/learned?

Thanks.

Scott
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux