> IMO the default install of gpg is good enough. Remember, you break it, you > get to keep the pieces. "Good enough" is in the eye of the beholder. If you want to use gpg-agent and pinentry, you need gpg2. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: GnuPG for CentOS 5.3?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: GnuPG for CentOS 5.3?
- From: lhecking@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 12:29:05 +0100
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <003501ca4350$66b93960$342bac20$@srbu@orgfarm.uu.se>
- References: <4AC5D960.6000806@xxxxxxxxxxx> <003501ca4350$66b93960$342bac20$@srbu@orgfarm.uu.se>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GnuPG for CentOS 5.3?
- From: Sorin Srbu
- Re: GnuPG for CentOS 5.3?
- References:
- GnuPG for CentOS 5.3?
- From: Dick Roth
- Re: GnuPG for CentOS 5.3?
- From: Sorin Srbu
- GnuPG for CentOS 5.3?
- Prev by Date: Re: GnuPG for CentOS 5.3?
- Next by Date: Re: GnuPG for CentOS 5.3?
- Previous by thread: Re: GnuPG for CentOS 5.3?
- Next by thread: Re: GnuPG for CentOS 5.3?
- Index(es):
 |