Re: CentOS for non-tech user

["Geoff Galitz" <geoff@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> 
> On 09/29/2009 09:21 AM, Geoff Galitz wrote:
> > Ubuntu has the LTS releases, which are long term stable releases. They
> are
> > supported for five years after release.
> 
> you might want to look into exactly what is ubuntu-support and how that
> compares with what you get with CentOS. Its not nearly the same thing.
> To an extent that LTS is mostly considered a nonstarter in most > very
> small business. Specially where the client is in a position to evaluate
> their options and work out the implications of what they are getting. It
> always surprises me how many are not.

Would you mind elaborating on your views on that?  I did some basic research
on the LTS offerings and I don't see any significant differences with the
exception of porting elements from Debian testing.

What constitutes real LTS in your view?

-geoff


---------------------------------
Geoff Galitz
Blankenheim NRW, Germany
http://www.galitz.org/
http://german-way.com/blog/

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos