Florin Andrei wrote: > Last time I saw this issue, no sparse files, nothing legit, it was a > corrupted FS. :( > Well, if I mount to another directory the size is right. My next step will be to fsck probably. Ryan _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: du vs df size difference
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: du vs df size difference
- From: Ryan Pugatch <rpug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:41:45 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4AC3E30C.50406@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Organization: TripAdvisor
- References: <4AC3C6AD.6010503@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <80d7e4090909301415y37b35ea0i9b6062f0ec11f367@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AC3DCD4.5090908@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AC3DE65.1060607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AC3E30C.50406@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: du vs df size difference
- From: Peter Kjellstrom
- Re: du vs df size difference
- References:
- du vs df size difference
- From: Ryan Pugatch
- Re: du vs df size difference
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: du vs df size difference
- From: Ryan Pugatch
- Re: du vs df size difference
- From: Ryan Pugatch
- Re: du vs df size difference
- From: Florin Andrei
- du vs df size difference
- Prev by Date: Re: Asterisk and VOIP was Re: CentOS for non-tech user
- Next by Date: Re: du vs df size difference
- Previous by thread: Re: du vs df size difference
- Next by thread: Re: du vs df size difference
- Index(es):
 |