Robert Heller wrote: > df does not look at files (deleted or not) at all! It just looks at > allocated inodes. yeah but the result is pretty much the same, at least to me. I suppose I could of worded it a bit differently. nate _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: du vs df size difference
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: du vs df size difference
- From: "nate" <centos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <200909302122.n8ULMNmS028197@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <4AC3C6AD.6010503@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <51660.10.10.10.51.1254345046.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200909302122.n8ULMNmS028197@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.9a
- References:
- du vs df size difference
- From: Ryan Pugatch
- Re: du vs df size difference
- From: nate
- Re: du vs df size difference
- From: Robert Heller
- du vs df size difference
- Prev by Date: Re: Asterisk and VOIP was Re: CentOS for non-tech user
- Next by Date: Re: OT: dmidecode data - what is maximum RAM capacity of this box?
- Previous by thread: Re: du vs df size difference
- Next by thread: Re: du vs df size difference
- Index(es):
 |