On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:35 AM, David Suhendrik <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > =D, Someone make me confused, and just a make sure here... > I'm so sorry for this... I was worried too, on the day I first saw the message. But I found (on that day) that the worst that would have happened would have been a name change for the distribution -- and now even that issue is no longer a problem. -- RonB -- Using CentOS 5.3 _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [Found] CentOS is dead, long live CentOS
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Found] CentOS is dead, long live CentOS
- From: Ron Blizzard <rb4centos@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:42:04 -0500
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4AAE1C89.1010405@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <4AAE1028.1010608@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1252921681.10368.20.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1252922462.22565.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AAE1C89.1010405@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Found] CentOS is dead, long live CentOS
- From: William L. Maltby
- Re: [Found] CentOS is dead, long live CentOS
- References:
- [Found] CentOS is dead, long live CentOS
- From: David Suhendrik
- Re: [Found] CentOS is dead, long live CentOS
- From: Ralph Angenendt
- Re: [Found] CentOS is dead, long live CentOS
- From: Christoph Maser
- Re: [Found] CentOS is dead, long live CentOS
- From: David Suhendrik
- [Found] CentOS is dead, long live CentOS
- Prev by Date: Re: LF examples - using site-specific RPMs for config
- Next by Date: Re: Securely backing up Linux machines to NAS?
- Previous by thread: Re: [Found] CentOS is dead, long live CentOS
- Next by thread: Re: [Found] CentOS is dead, long live CentOS
- Index(es):
 |