Scott Ehrlich wrote: > Ideas are welcome. Quite a situation your in, if security is that much of a concern glad I don't work where you are, sounds like a real pain in the ass. Your only options to mount the NAS from what I could see on the data sheet are FTP and Samba. So what I would do is probably use something like rsnapshot over ssh. Use key based authentication so your "server" can login to the other systems(not vise versa), if your really paranoid you could even assign a pass phrase to the key and use something like ssh-agent to manually run backups. Copy the files to the linux server first, encrypt them, perhaps copy them directly to a loopback mounted file system that is encrypted already. Then send the encrypted file(s)/image(s) to the NAS box via whatever protocol you want. Don't send the data unencrypted to the NAS box at all. Treat the data as compromised, it doesn't matter who gets their hands on it, if they don't have your keys and passwords they can't unlock it. You could go a step further and run an encrypted file system on the servers themselves to store the sensitive data, and back up the raw image(make sure it's in a consistent state). I can't imagine a situation where the data is so important to do this sort of a procedure and yet rely on a such a piece of crap NAS box as the one your tasked with using. Even when I worked at a company that processed millions in CC transactions a day we didn't have that kind of paranoia. Of course the networks themselves were fairly well protected. nate _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos