On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen<pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:22:56AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
>> Rob Kampen wrote:
>> > One of my clients use a software product that is "upgrading" and will
>> > shortly utilize micro$oft SQL server 2005.
>> > Currently the clients are XP on older machines with the database
>> > residing on a Samba / CentOS server and this works very well.
>> > Question: Does anyone run SQL server from XP in a virtualbox on CentOS?
>> > Any other configuration that works on a linux server?
>> > I do not want to have to buy another server grade machine just for
>> > this application.
>>
>> SQL Server only runs on Windows SERVER OS's. on a desktop OS like XP,
>> youc an only run the 'lite' version aka MSDE or SQL Express depending on
>> which version, and this only allows a very few database connections, and
>> is mostly suited for standalone single user applications and software
>> development.
>>
>> SQL Server has fairly expensive licensing per user too.
>>
>> I would NOT virtualize a SQL database server, they have intensive disk
>> IO I/O requirements. also don't run a database on a network mounted
>> file system (samba, NAS, etc) for the same reason.
>>
>
> I've been running various MSSQL databases on VMware VMs without problems..
> of course you need to have fast enough disks (or a SAN).
>
> Also I've been running Oracle, Mysql and PostgreSQL databases on
> Xen virtual machines for years without problems.
>
> It all depends on your CPU and/or IO requirements.. if you need all the
> possible resources, then virtualization is not a good thing.
Actually $$$ can overcome that.
I know serveral high transaction SQL implementations running off of
ESX going to either FC 3Par or EMC systems.
But I don't think the OP's requirements are at that level by the sound
of things.
-Ross
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
