On Sep 7, 2009, at 8:12 PM, Christopher Chan <christopher.chan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote: > Joseph L. Casale wrote: >>> Did you install your iet from rpms or something then? >>> >> >> No, but it looks like Ross Walker has created an updated spec >> in the source. It's the *only* thing I don't use am rpm for as >> there isn't anyone with an updated repo, I think atrpms is behind >> but I haven't checked recently. >> > > It appears that the Technology Preview has now moved to become a > Product > Enhancement from the link Ralph posted: > > http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2009-0099.html > > Maybe that takes away some of the manual stuff. Joseph vouches for > IET's > stability. Has anybody given tgt a run and can comment on tgt's > performance and stability? TGT is stable, performance is slightly less then IET due to running in user space (no zero copy), configuration is slightly more complex due to being a general SCSI target rather than a dedicated iSCSI target. Depends on ones needs and preferences. -Ross _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos