> But note that drive capacity has gone up too, often eliminating the need > for many-disk arrays. For example, you can go up to 2TB on a single > drive, so a simple RAID1 mirror may be all you need, and if you can > arrange the mount points to match the use pattern you may get better > performance out of several separate raid1 partitions where the heads can > seek independently instead of essentially tying them all together in a > That is assuming a multi-platter disk and that you can actually partition things in such a way that different heads get to exclusively handle partitions most of the time. > single array. A many-disk array may do better on artificial benchmarks > accessing one big file, but that's not what most computers actually do - > and raid1 has the advantages of not slowing down when a member fails and > you can recover the data from any single drive. > > We are still talking about raid1+0 here...no raid5 or what not you know. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos