> Going with what CentOS ships, even if the package number indicates an
> older release, you have the advantage that the upstream takes care for
> security fixes by backporting.
Hmmm, I hadn't considered this but you are absolutely right!
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food"
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Need httpd / apache RPM > 2.2.3 for 5.3
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Need httpd / apache RPM > 2.2.3 for 5.3
- From: Alan McKay <alan.mckay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 20:00:27 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4A999AD4.6090706@xxxxxxxxx>
- References: <844129e80908280732t70bfb777s61bde03b95ad0db5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <302ce8b50908280739k3ad43670l8b66877f9e8030ad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <844129e80908280748t2f5630eu977e7d962e93fc6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <302ce8b50908280808o7507f362u1af78fe88a0899fb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <844129e80908280911o54aa8a43jb9d717c69fcb13cf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A999AD4.6090706@xxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- Need httpd / apache RPM > 2.2.3 for 5.3
- From: Alan McKay
- Re: Need httpd / apache RPM > 2.2.3 for 5.3
- From: Jim Perrin
- Re: Need httpd / apache RPM > 2.2.3 for 5.3
- From: Alan McKay
- Re: Need httpd / apache RPM > 2.2.3 for 5.3
- From: Jim Perrin
- Re: Need httpd / apache RPM > 2.2.3 for 5.3
- From: Alan McKay
- Re: Need httpd / apache RPM > 2.2.3 for 5.3
- From: Alexander Dalloz
- Need httpd / apache RPM > 2.2.3 for 5.3
- Prev by Date: how to setup the ISPConfig
- Next by Date: Re: kernel-2.6.18-128.7.1.el5.i686 update breaks AMD onboard sound
- Previous by thread: Re: Need httpd / apache RPM > 2.2.3 for 5.3
- Next by thread: Re: Need httpd / apache RPM > 2.2.3 for 5.3
- Index(es):
 |