RedShift wrote: > Ryan Pugatch wrote: >> Yes, I changed the variable in the spec and installed the RPM I built. >> I am on a 64-bit machine but did not install a 32-bit RPM. >> >> Looks like there are two versions.. the original and mine. What should >> I do? >> >> Requested output: >> >> [rpug@localhost ~]$ rpm -qi freetype >> Name : freetype Relocations: (not relocatable) >> Version : 2.2.1 Vendor: CentOS >> Release : 21.el5_3 Build Date: Fri 22 May 2009 >> 10:04:13 AM EDT >> Install Date: Thu 27 Aug 2009 01:06:54 PM EDT Build Host: >> builder16.centos.org >> Group : System Environment/Libraries Source RPM: >> freetype-2.2.1-21.el5_3.src.rpm >> Size : 626801 License: BSD/GPL dual license >> Signature : DSA/SHA1, Fri 22 May 2009 05:22:59 PM EDT, Key ID >> a8a447dce8562897 >> URL : http://www.freetype.org >> Summary : A free and portable font rendering engine >> Description : >> The FreeType engine is a free and portable font rendering >> engine, developed to provide advanced font support for a variety of >> platforms and environments. FreeType is a library which can open and >> manages font files as well as efficiently load, hint and render >> individual glyphs. FreeType is not a font server or a complete >> text-rendering library. >> Name : freetype Relocations: (not relocatable) >> Version : 2.2.1 Vendor: (none) >> Release : 20 Build Date: Thu 27 Aug 2009 >> 04:24:21 PM EDT >> Install Date: Thu 27 Aug 2009 04:25:44 PM EDT Build Host: >> localhost.localdomain >> Group : System Environment/Libraries Source RPM: >> freetype-2.2.1-20.src.rpm >> Size : 655297 License: BSD/GPL dual license >> Signature : (none) >> Packager : Pugatch Ryan >> URL : http://www.freetype.org >> Summary : A free and portable font rendering engine >> Description : >> The FreeType engine is a free and portable font rendering >> engine, developed to provide advanced font support for a variety of >> platforms and environments. FreeType is a library which can open and >> manages font files as well as efficiently load, hint and render >> individual glyphs. FreeType is not a font server or a complete >> text-rendering library. >> >> > > > Why do you have two freetypes installed? That shouldn't be possible. They should have conflicting files. Fix this first. One is likely i386 and the other x86_64 ... The first thing I do when I install an x86_64 machine is exclude *.i[3456]86 in the yum.conf file. (If I have to run i386 things, I install an i386 machine ... but that is just me). I then remove all i[3,4,5,6] packages and only install update x86_64 packages. I understand that some people have to have x86_64 workstations for certain things (cad/video editing, etc.) where they need > 8 GB RAM and the things x86_64 can do there. They also need some i386 packages (like firefox) since x86_64 alternatives are not good or not available. In these cases, you need to keep as minimal a number if i386 packages on your machine as you possibly can. Again, this is my opinion ... others might have a different one. If you want to see the arch of all packages with rpm queries, create a file called .rpmmacros in a users home dir and add this line: %_query_all_fmt %%{name}-%%{version}-%%{release}.%%{arch} Then when you do "rpm -q" queries, you will see things like this: rpm -q freetype freetype-2.1.9-8.el4.6.x86_64 freetype-2.1.9-8.el4.6.i386 (this was just an example from a c4 machine ... package versions not relevant to this thread :D )
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
