>We have a few (p800). My opinion is that they're acceptable but not fast. Heard this a few times now, in the interest of getting something better next time, what have you found equally reliable but faster? >- hpacucli requires you to twist your brain sideways (syntax) Heh, that's no doubt:) _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: p800 and HP
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "'CentOS mailing list'" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: p800 and HP
- From: "Joseph L. Casale" <JCasale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:50:23 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <200908211846.45892.cap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <1cbd6f830908201910l69c5d931uf79ccdafb31ca008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200908211846.45892.cap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Thread-index: AQHKIn71LMkrNVVxiUCXDGX4PbM0E5CwuZ9Q
- Thread-topic: p800 and HP
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: p800 and HP
- From: Peter Kjellstrom
- Re: p800 and HP
- References:
- p800 and HP
- From: Mag Gam
- Re: p800 and HP
- From: Peter Kjellstrom
- p800 and HP
- Prev by Date: Re: p800 and HP
- Next by Date: anaconda and x86_64
- Previous by thread: Re: p800 and HP
- Next by thread: Re: p800 and HP
- Index(es):
 |