Re: OT: Fortunate clueless dd chum - lvm recovery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Ross Walker wrote:
> 
> Since you don't know if LVM has a recovery path how can you imply it  
> doesn't?

I've seen plenty of evidence that tools for LVM recovery are lacking.
I see postings from people asking about recovery of damaged LVM
volumes and not getting any reasonable answers about how to repair.
Or, complexity of dealing with things like duplicate volume group names
when physically moving disk drives.  Conventional partitioning works
just fine for me, and I'm confident that I can handle just about any
situation that crops up.  I don't need an additional layer of
complexity.

-- 
Bob Nichols     "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address.
                 Do NOT delete it.

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux