On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 06:52:09AM -0400, R P Herrold wrote: > Here as well, we differ -- CentOS at its core is about boring, and > stable and conservative as a core value. You are in the wrong place > if you think otherwise. It makes a fine BASE to build on, as Dag's > archive has long demonstrated, but there is NOT a good fit for a > beginner to start doing invasive changes to get 'the latest and > greatest' to compile. That is the 'rap' as to Axel's archive, and > why people end up frustrated using it and moan and groan about their > ignorance and NOT READING our clear warnings on the wiki's > Repositories page I'm not sure I understand correctly, does that mean that you imply ATrpms is doing invasive changes to CentOS/RHEL and people using it end up frustrated while ATrpms is showing ignorance towards them? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpLwTsTFo2EE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
