Les Mikesell wrote: > R P Herrold wrote: >>> project, just the PR vibes here. You aren't giving people the warm >>> fuzzies about the project's ability to survive when you make it come >>> across as having a stranglehold of control. >> I missed the memo -- what do we have a stranglehold on? > > Remember, I'm just commenting on appearances and wording, but all you > have to do is read this thread to see that there are people offering to > help and being refused. And meanwhile there are things that aren't on > schedule. Or maybe there isn't a schedule - or maybe no one is supposed > to expect one. > >>> We'd feel better if you shared your contingency plans. >> I've done that repeatedly -- either people do not read, or >> will not believe what we write. Nothing of human creation >> cannot be all things to all people and it is foolish to think >> otherwise. > > That was in response to Johnny's comment about having to personally know > someone before they would be allowed to touch anything in the > repository. What if something happens to Johnny? Is there a bigger > picture? > There are several other people all with the capability to build things ... we are just not adding more. There are only 2 people building SciLinux. I am tired of all the complaining. Use it or don't, at this point I don't care.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
