Christoph Maser wrote on Thu, 6 Aug 2009 16:18:26 +0200: > Looks like rpmforge has the same or a higher prio (lower number) than > base.... maybe base has accidentally none. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: rpmforge.repo
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: rpmforge.repo
- From: Kai Schaetzl <maillists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:31:30 +0200
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <1249568306.5647.31.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <4A7AE16B.7000208@xxxxxxxxxx> <1249568306.5647.31.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- rpmforge.repo
- From: Sam Drinkard
- Re: rpmforge.repo
- From: Christoph Maser
- rpmforge.repo
- Prev by Date: Re: CentOS Project Infrastructure
- Next by Date: Re: Million linux virtual machines
- Previous by thread: Re: rpmforge.repo
- Next by thread: CentOS Project Infrastructure
- Index(es):
 |