Just to answer two of those questions: Marcus Moeller wrote: > THE WIKI: > > For me a wiki is a collaboration platform which should be accessible > to every contributor in the same manner (except the front and user > pages). That means there should be a join process (where you have to > agree to the cc license) which then leads to EditGroup membership. Yes. That hasn't been furthered by me because of what is in the open by now. I wanted to have some things cleared first - this has now happened. > A comment function could be a good feature but in a comparatively > small community like ours, most of everything can be discussed via ML > or could be handled through page changelog. There is no real functional comment function for moin, afaics. > THE BUGTRACKER: > > The CentOS bugtracker contains a lot of upstream bugs that cannot be > fixed here. We have to make sure that these are tracked upstream and > fixed there. Everybody is invited to help us to do that. Looks like there are only about 4 to 5 people who regularly look at bugs and take care about them without being pointed to specific bugs by others. This is something which has *no* barrier at all. Ralph
Attachment:
pgpY6gjFxzG3H.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
