Re: Open Letter to Lance Davis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Has anyone considered joining forces with Scientific Linux to reduce the 
>>   workload and give both a more robust infrastructure?
> 
> Yes, but the goals are rather different.

I thought both had upstream compatibility as the main goal - and both 
seem competent enough that I wouldn't expect many problems in this 
regard.  SL also claims a secondary goal of making site customization 
easy - perhaps Centos as we know it could simply be one of those 
customizations and going forward other variations would be easy.  If the 
people doing the work aren't getting any value out of the brand name, I 
don't see the point of fragmenting the user community for what is 
essentially the same thing.

-- 
  Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux