Re: Open Letter to Lance Davis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Lots of speculation where little is known.  It'd be best to let the  
team do their thing and not stress.  Flooding their channels with  
concern only makes their jobs harder.  It'd be best to hang back, wait  
to see what happens, and then jump at any opportunity to help when  
*requested* by the team.  Innuendo and gossip only makes the whole  
community look bad.

Big thanks to all the efforts of everyone involved with this project.

Aaron

On Jul 30, 2009, at 1:32 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 08:26:37PM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> Has anyone considered joining forces with Scientific Linux to  
>>> reduce the
>>>  workload and give both a more robust infrastructure?
>>
>> Yes, but the goals are rather different.
>
> It'd almost be nice to go under the Fedora umbrella, except I doubt  
> Red
> Hat would approve. :-)
>
> Probalby independant makes the most sense.  Infrastructure and core
> folk are already in place...
>
> Ray
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux