Re: Open Letter to Lance Davis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Monty Shinn
> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 10:11
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re:  Open Letter to Lance Davis
> 
> Craig White wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 14:49 +0200, Tim Verhoeven wrote:
> >> If people want more background information, please read 
> the blogs of 
> >> some of the developers available at :
> >>
> >> http://planet.centos.org/
> >>
> >> That should give everyone a idea of what has happened and 
> where the 
> >> problems are according to us. But like Jim said, let us 
> know what you 
> >> feel is important for you.
> > ----
> > I think that most of us are unconcerned with the specific 
> aspects of 
> > CentOS management and clearly support the ones who appear to do all 
> > the work, in this case, the ones who signed this 'open letter'
> > 
> > Perhaps you can just say to Lance, thanks and keep whatever money, 
> > just turn over the domain name and then you can get your 
> own paypal & 
> > adsense accounts.
> > 
> > Craig
> > 
> > 
> 
> Indeed, the intellectual property clearly does not reside 
> solely with Lance.  Physical property (servers, etc...), I don't know.
> 
> To those that have been able to donate money, I would like to 
> say thank you.  The project is still alive, so the money must 
> have been used to some extent to support the project.
> 
> The open letter seems to be quite measured, intended to bring 
> public notice to Lance and inform the community at large.  
> The letter also proves that the project has a level of 
> administrative self-correction and accountability - this is a 
> good thing.
> 
> Perhaps if a couple of the principals of the project live in 
> close proximity to Lance, a *non-confrontational* knock on 
> his door, followed by a face-to-face meeting would resolve 
> most issues.  Perhaps not.


I noticed the domain is registered with tucows, I have before delt with
situations like this where the authorized domain contact had seperated from the
organization and refused to participate in the update of the authorized contact.

If you keep it at the same registrar and just update the administrator contact
it gets pretty easy.

Is the centos organization an US based entity?

> 
> I would also like to take this opportunity to thank all the 
> developers and participants involved in making the CentOS 
> distro what it is.  I trust the current administrative issues 
> will be resolved quickly.
> 
> Thanks again,
> 
> Monty
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 

Let us know how we can help.


-Jason


--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-                                                               -
- Jason Pyeron                      PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Principal Consultant              10 West 24th Street #100    -
- +1 (443) 269-1555 x333            Baltimore, Maryland 21218   -
-                                                               -
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux