In-Reply-To=<4A70B20C.5020808@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To:
(Apologies if this isn't in the thread properly; I'm trying to fake it from
the website headers :-))
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2009-July/004794.html
>
> I've updated 2 machines, and had no problems here. But some wider
> testing would be good and we can get them into the main repos so more
> people benefit.
I just updated one machine; the process ended up with named not running.
I did
rpm -Uvh bind-utils-9.2.4-30.el4_8.4.i386.rpm bind-9.2.4-30.el4_8.4.i386.rpm bind-libs-9.2.4-30.el4_8.4.i386.rpm
and got
Jul 29 20:29:15 linode named: succeeded
Jul 29 20:29:16 linode named[2873]: shutting down: flushing changes
Jul 29 20:29:16 linode named[2873]: stopping command channel on 127.0.0.1#953
Jul 29 20:29:16 linode named[2873]: no longer listening on 127.0.0.1#53
Jul 29 20:29:16 linode named[2873]: no longer listening on 66.160.141.105#53
Jul 29 20:29:17 linode named[2873]: exiting
Jul 29 20:29:18 linode named: failed
After a restart it appeared to work...
Jul 29 20:29:41 linode named[31609]: starting BIND 9.2.4 -u named
Jul 29 20:29:41 linode named[31609]: using 4 CPUs
Jul 29 20:29:41 linode named[31609]: loading configuration from '/etc/named.conf'
etc...
The daemon seems to be responding properly to requests after this manual
start.
--
rgds
Stephen
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
