Re: Lowest latency remote file system

[Ray Van Dolson <rayvd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:11:31AM +0300, James Matthews wrote:
> I am looking to mount it and as a webserver/database server. So you are
> recommending NFS?
> 
> James

If you need shared access to the data, NFS is probably the simplest way
to go.  Depending on how busy things are, you might be fine with
standard gig links as well.

If you don't need shared access, iSCSI/ATAoE, etc become an option (you
could use them with a clustered filesystem also if you needed shared
access, but this adds a layer of complexity).

Maybe you can define your use case a bit more.

Ray
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos