>OK, so the drivers are paravirtualized, not the >entire OS. I think I get it. Yeah, instead of me paraphrasing and probably butchering what is well stated, have a quick read of this article. Lots of good info... http://searchservervirtualization.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid94_gci1281856_mem1,00.html hth, jlc _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Window Server 2003 will not run as paravirtualized?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "'CentOS mailing list'" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Window Server 2003 will not run as paravirtualized?
- From: "Joseph L. Casale" <JCasale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 23:55:52 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <0AFCFB0AD7BA46F19CFE0645AF724368@neilhp>
- References: <44D1BA8582984A1CA0FCC6B761239D37@neilhp> <ABF9510930E1374BA4B4C61A01104FBD966723@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <0AFCFB0AD7BA46F19CFE0645AF724368@neilhp>
- Thread-index: Acn//vtNjTx+eoFKTviK5hyQXaEgkQAE6TugAATHvnAAADzHAA==
- Thread-topic: Window Server 2003 will not run as paravirtualized?
- References:
- Window Server 2003 will not run as paravirtualized?
- From: Neil Aggarwal
- Re: Window Server 2003 will not run as paravirtualized?
- From: Joseph L. Casale
- Re: Window Server 2003 will not run as paravirtualized?
- From: Neil Aggarwal
- Window Server 2003 will not run as paravirtualized?
- Prev by Date: Re: Window Server 2003 will not run as paravirtualized?
- Next by Date: Re: Question about optimal filesystem with many small files.
- Previous by thread: Re: Window Server 2003 will not run as paravirtualized?
- Next by thread: OT:CMS
- Index(es):
 |