Thanks for your responce!
If I open up Iptables to accept everything on eth3 and eth2 or turn it off all together I get the same results.
I will have to look through your iproute2 commands to see how they match up to mine. Do you see anything different in mine that would indicate the issue?
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Christopher Chan <christopher.chan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello Doug,
Here are the iproute2 commands for a multigateway setup I did.
ip route add 220.232.217.72/29 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src
220.232.217.78 table pacific
ip route add 10.9.0.0/17 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src
10.9.1.101 table pacific
ip route add default via 220.232.217.73 dev eth0 table pacific
ip route add 203.174.45.24/29 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src
203.174.45.30 table wharf
ip route add 10.9.0.0/17 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src
10.9.1.101 table wharf
ip route add default via 203.174.45.25 dev eth2 table wharf
ip route add 59.152.193.16/29 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src
59.152.193.22 table frahw
ip route add 10.9.0.0/17 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src
10.9.1.101 table frahw
ip route add default via 59.152.193.17 dev eth2 table wharf
ip route add 10.9.0.0/17 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src
10.9.1.101 table saurer
ip route add 10.0.0.0/8 via 10.9.0.1 dev eth1 table saurer
ip rule add from 220.232.217.78 to default lookup pacific
ip rule add from 203.174.45.30 to default lookup wharf
You may also want to check your firewall rules too.
I must also say that there are no GATEWAY entries in my ifcfg-ethx. Only
one in network.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
