As a really radical suggestion, perhaps you should consider moving this
"discussion" to the rpmforge mail list, since it seems that most of your
issues are focused on that repository. You might even find a larger
collection of viewpoints there.
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 11:32 -0700, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
> > I believe that YOU are the only person on this list
> > who has expressed an interest in "audacious"
> > (whatever it is & does) for CentOS during these several
> > days of rant.
>
> I believe that YOU are the only person on this list
> (whoever you are & do) to have suggested popularity as
> a required raison d'être. Maybe we should make a poll:
> from the 8,614 RPM files RPMforge are, I am pretty much
> sure you wouldn't find in a couple of days more than
> 1 person to express interest in *half* of them. Should
> half of them be dropped?
>
> R-C
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo! Answers and share what you know at http://ca.answers.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--
Ron Loftin reloftin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
"God, root, what is difference ?" Piter from UserFriendly
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
