Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
>
>>> Anyway, as I said previously, I would rather see the CentOS
>>> Project concentrate on the core product and do a really good
>>> job on that (i.e, a move closer to the old 4 week release lag
>>> than the current 10 week release lag), and I would much rather
>>> see this than effort diluted by taking on a contrib repo.
>>
>> Right:
>> http://beranger.org/v3/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/useless_chart_rhel5_clones.png
>>
>>
>> After all, I love (some) charts from time to time.
>
> I'd be very interested to have a similar chart of the average delay for
> updates plotted in time. Not because I think it shows something
> fantastic, but rather to give us a better target to meet.
>
Same here.
Maybe something along the lines of the 'days at risk' reports Mark Cox
produces for RHEL:
http://www.awe.com/mark/blog/
http://www.awe.com/mark/blog/2009012017.html
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
