Thanks
----- Original Message ----
> From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 11:46:15 AM
> Subject: Re: Dag's comment at linuxtag
>
> On 06/29/2009 08:06 PM, Bogdan Nicolescu wrote:
> > The whole point of the question is to make sure that Centos will remain 100%
> binary compatible with PNAELV, at least in terms of package version. This does
> not mean that others will not have the ability to break this 100% binary
> compatibility, at least in tersm of package version, by installing more
> "up-to-date" packages from "extra repositories".
>
> yes.
>
> > By "extra repository(ies)" I mean any other repository that contains packages
> which are not in PNAELV.
>
> yes again, and some of these 'extra repos' might be hosted within the
> project itself.
>
> - KB
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
