Bogdan Nicolescu wrote: > > not to be rude but back to the core of the original question: > > is is safe to assume that future releases of Centos will remain a > "built from publicly available open source SRPMS provided by a prominent North American Enterprise Linux vendor. CentOS conforms fully with the upstream > vendors redistribution policies and aims to be 100% binary compatible. > (CentOS mainly changes packages to remove upstream vendor branding and > artwork).", AND all additional non-PNAELV packages will remain in the > extra repository??? Eh, yes. That kind of is the whole point of it. Ralph
Attachment:
pgpDwzJ27zGzN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
