On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Dag Wieers wrote:
>
>> Now, I always thought that RPMforge wouldn't have the resources to
>> start making the repositories compatible, but apparently the Fedora
>> projecy is simply not even interested in doing this.
>
> Dag, we had a lengthy thread on the rpmforge list not long ago to debunk
> this, and I was under the impression you were ammendable to working
> together. Has something changed?
Rex,
I don't see any effort from the Fedora side to do anything about this. It
is not just about updating libdvdread in a orchestrated fashion, if the
end goal is not to merge and provide an upgrade path, then it's a waste of
time IMO.
At LinuxTag 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis basicly said that Fedora has too many
rules to make it feasible.
But I am open to discuss anything as long as people can migrate to it. I
do fear that the interest in the EPEL project is very centered to the
latest RHEL only though, but even that can be fixed.
--
-- dag wieers, dag@xxxxxxxxxx, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
