Geoff Galitz wrote: >> I've mostly used the free VMware server and player, but thought the >> networking >> support was about the same as Virtualbox. What have you found that is >> significantly different? So far I mostly prefer VMware server for the >> ability >> to run the console and disconnect/reconnect where with virtualbox you seem >> to >> have to decide ahead of time if you want a console or not - but I'm not a >> big >> fan of the new web console in the 2.x series. >> > > > There are two major issues I've had with VMWare Workstation that have > not occurred in VirtualBox: > > > 1) When the host network connection comes and goes (either intentionally or > otherwise) the networking to and from VMWare VMs fail completely and cannot > be restored without a host reboot. I don't think I've ever seen that happen under vmware server - and I've had guests up for at least a year without reboots. With player I've normally stopped the guest before disconnecting from the network. Are you using bridged or NAT? > 2) DHCP via an external system (router/gateway) often fails to the VMs with > nothing more than timeout errors in the VM logs. I've never seen a problem with DHCP on bridged connections under any circumstances. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos