On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 12:00 -0400, centos-request@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Message: 45
> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:48:25 +0200
> From: "M. Fioretti" <mfioretti@xxxxxxxxxxx>
1. Subject: Re: How to reply to a digest
> To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <20090611114825.GD2499@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 07:42:28 AM -0400, David McGuffey wrote:
>
> > So...what is the appropriate way to respond when one is receiving
> > the digest version?
>
> It probably is to automatically split the digest into the original,
> separate message as soon as it arrives, using procmail or
> formail. Search for "procmail split digests" and you'll find
> several explanations.
>
> This said, I really have to ask: do whatever you like as long as you
> don't break threads but... why on Earth do you use digests? Are you
> with an ISP which limits how many messages you can receive per day?
> That's the only valid reasons I've ever read for digests in ~15 years
> of email usage...
>
> Just curious,
> Marco Fioretti
I'll go back and see if I can change from digest to individual e-mail
mode. Then use some Evolution rules to put the e-mails into a separate
folder.
Dave
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
