On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 09:33 -0700, Linux Advocate wrote: > <snip> > [root@fwgw unix]# pwd > /dev/shm/unix > <snip> Note that /dev/shm is a tempfs file system. It will be dynamically populated. I would expect the attack vector still resides on your system somewhere else. -- Bill _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....
- From: "William L. Maltby" <CentOS4Bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 12:56:22 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <471684.32322.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <12cde01c9e452$ab9d6540$0301a8c0@xxxxxxxxx> <471684.32322.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....
- From: Linux Advocate
- Re: Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....
- References:
- Re: Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....
- From: Linux Advocate
- Re: Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....
- Prev by Date: Re: Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....
- Next by Date: Re: release/update question
- Previous by thread: Re: Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....
- Next by thread: Re: Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....
- Index(es):
 |