Re: resolving names it is really slow slow with CentOS5.x using named

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]





On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:23 PM, carlopmart <carlopmart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Victor Padro wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:05 PM, carlopmart <carlopmart@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:carlopmart@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>     RobertH wrote:
>      > ive read most of the thread, yet not all. forgive me as i might
>     have missed
>      > some of this below in helping...
>      >
>      > carlopmart,
>      >
>      > what is in your /etc/resolv.conf
>
>     search hpulabs.org <http://hpulabs.org>
>     nameserver 127.0.0.1
>
>      >
>      > is it configured correctly?
>      >
>      > are you using ipv6?
>
>     no.
>
>      >
>      > if not, is it fully disabled / turned off?
>      >
>      > in modprobe.conf put
>      >
>      > alias net-pf-10 off
>      > alias ipv6 off
>
>     I have configured this previously ..
>
>
>      >
>      > reboot...
>      >
>      > also, are you loading those other opsys on the same machine and
>     getting good
>      > results or different machines?
>
>     I have good results using different operating systems but using same
>     hardware ..
>
>
>      >
>      > testing other opsys on different hardware could be problematic.
>      >
>      > did you bother to check the physical ports to see if any problems
>     in the
>      > switch or with ethtool on the server interface ?
>
>     No, I didn't do it because i have good results using other opsys ...
>      >
>      > thoughtfully consinder following advise of others re: tcp and dns
>      >
>      > cables...
>      >
>      >  - rh
>      >
>      > _______________________________________________
>      > CentOS mailing list
>      > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx>
>      > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>      >
>
>
>     --
>     CL Martinez
>     carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
>     _______________________________________________
>     CentOS mailing list
>     CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
> Have you double checked your SELinux config?

SeLinux is disabled on both CentOS servers ...

>
> You said you tested different OS'es on the same hardware?  or tested
> different OS'es on the same hardware but different servers?

Same hardware and same server, because all opsys are installed on a ESXi 3.5u4
server with vmware tools ...

>
> Maybe remotely could be a faulty NIC.

Maybe, but why only centos have problems??


>
>
>
> --
> "It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion."
>
> "Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o
> mediocremente servidas"
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


--
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


So, the problem resides on an ESXi CentOS VM?

I thought you were using a dedicated server though.

If so, what are you using as a NIC?

Sometimes the driver for e1000 gets faulty on RHEL/CentOS VMs, happened to me a couple times, just add a new NIC to solve that.


--
"It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion."

"Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o mediocremente servidas"
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux