On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 05:20:25PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > What are the kernel versions? CentOS kernel: 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.centos.plus Fedora 10 kernel: 2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.i686 Ray _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...
- From: Ray Van Dolson <rayvd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 14:25:18 -0700
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <200905252120.n4PLKP8K005653@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <20090525181730.GA26631@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090525182602.GA26934@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.LRH.2.00.0905252113210.28172@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.LRH.2.00.0905252120510.28172@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090525195355.GA28330@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <200905252120.n4PLKP8K005653@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...
- From: Robert Heller
- Re: lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...
- References:
- lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...
- From: Ray Van Dolson
- Re: lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...
- From: Ray Van Dolson
- Re: lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...
- From: Dag Wieers
- Re: lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...
- From: Dag Wieers
- Re: lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...
- From: Ray Van Dolson
- Re: lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...
- From: Robert Heller
- lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...
- Prev by Date: Re: resolving names it is really slow slow with CentOS5.x using named
- Next by Date: Re: lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...
- Previous by thread: Re: lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...
- Next by thread: Re: lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...
- Index(es):
 |