On Sun, 24 May 2009, Dag Wieers wrote: > The syslinux firmware is not as good as dd-wrt (which I prefer) and s/syslinux/LinkSys/ But I guess you'd figured that out before I did :) -- -- dag wieers, dag@xxxxxxxxxx, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors] _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Intel Atom systems?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Intel Atom systems?
- From: Dag Wieers <dag@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 13:18:34 +0200 (CEST)
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <alpine.LRH.2.00.0905241224480.17630@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Organization: DAGIT Linux Solutions
- References: <20090523172246.GA7800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A184BBE.2010001@xxxxxxxxx> <20090523193731.GA1886@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.LRH.2.00.0905241224480.17630@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (LRH 1167 2008-08-23)
- References:
- Intel Atom systems?
- From: Bill Campbell
- Re: Intel Atom systems?
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: Intel Atom systems?
- From: Bill Campbell
- Re: Intel Atom systems?
- From: Dag Wieers
- Intel Atom systems?
- Prev by Date: Re: madwifi not working for 5.2 x64
- Next by Date: Re: Fixing to bite the dust?
- Previous by thread: Re: Intel Atom systems?
- Next by thread: Re: Intel Atom systems?
- Index(es):
 |