On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 13:20 +0200, Equinox86 wrote:
> yes centos is not for desktop it's guaranteee, if you don't have much
> time and want a distro updated at last release, if you have much time
> to spend to recompile dependences i advice use slackware, is fast and
> desktop friendly, similar to swiss knife.
I bet it can't CUT HOT Butter Either!
> but if you have a server, probably best choice is centos.
>
> 2009/5/20 Ralph Angenendt <ra+centos@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> John Kennedy wrote:
> > As much as I like CentOS, I tend to agree with the other
> posts. I don't think
> > it is the right distro for non techies.
>
>
> Why?
>
> > I set up my in-laws with Linux Mint (running KDE, of course)
> and they could
> > even handle installing the codecs and other non OSS stuff.
> Mint is a nice
> > distro based on Ubuntu.
>
>
> And force them to update the complete Distribution every other
> year?
>
> Ralph
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
