Re: Preventing hour-long fsck on ext3-filesystem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



on 5-14-2009 2:21 PM Les Mikesell spake the following:
> Scott Silva wrote:
>> on 5-14-2009 1:24 PM Pasi � spake the following:
>>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 06:23:05PM +0200, Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
>>>> Thank you all for your quick answers (you guys must have started
>>>> typing BEFORE I hit the Send-button).
>>>>
>>>> The general consensus seems to be "If you can start anew: use
>>>> XFS". This leaves one question: as the XFS is not included in the
>>>> standard-kernel which option offers the "smoothest sailing"
>>>> (especially during kernel-updates):
>>> It seems XFS might be added as a default to RHEL 5.4.. 
>>>
>> Probably not a default, but an option.
> 
> Is this a reasonable choice on a 32 bit machine?  I thought 4k stacks 
> were a problem.
> 
I'm sure that RedHat can easily build 32 bit kernels with 8k stacks if they so
choose.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux