on 5-14-2009 2:21 PM Les Mikesell spake the following: > Scott Silva wrote: >> on 5-14-2009 1:24 PM Pasi � spake the following: >>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 06:23:05PM +0200, Bernhard Gschaider wrote: >>>> Thank you all for your quick answers (you guys must have started >>>> typing BEFORE I hit the Send-button). >>>> >>>> The general consensus seems to be "If you can start anew: use >>>> XFS". This leaves one question: as the XFS is not included in the >>>> standard-kernel which option offers the "smoothest sailing" >>>> (especially during kernel-updates): >>> It seems XFS might be added as a default to RHEL 5.4.. >>> >> Probably not a default, but an option. > > Is this a reasonable choice on a 32 bit machine? I thought 4k stacks > were a problem. > I'm sure that RedHat can easily build 32 bit kernels with 8k stacks if they so choose.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
