On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 05:44:11PM +0200, Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm justing in the process of setting up a new fileserver for our
> company. I'm installing CentOS 5.3 (64 bit) on it.
>
> One of the "problems" with it is that it has a 3.5TB filesystem for
> the user data which I formatted during setup as an ext3. Now my
> experience with our current fileserver is that a 0.5TB ext3 filesystem
> needs approx half an hour to complete (and kicks in every so and so
> reboots or every 180days). My estimate is that for the larger
> filesystem (and the faster machine) the fsck would need well over an
> hour (being optimistic). I dread the day when I have to reboot the
> server and wait for 2hours or more just because the system thought it
> would be a prudent thing to check the filesystem.
>
> My question:
>
> - is there another stable filesystem (XFS, ReiserFS ...) in the
> centosplus-kernel where this could be avoided (fsck is faster) and
> that is as safe as ext3
> - Or would it be better to switch off automatic checking with tune2fs
Yes, you could use XFS. Or, use tune2fs on the filesystem to disable
the automatic checking:
# tune2fs -c 0 -i 0 /dev/whatever
See tune2fs(8) for more information. The -m 0 parameter may also be
useful as by default 5% of blocks are "reserved" (useful for root
filesystems).
>
> Any opinion/experience welcome. I looked around a bit but couldn't
> find a good answer
>
> Bernhard
>
> PS: Sorry for the stupid question, but I'm only part-time admin and
> testing this myself would take weeks, I guess
Ray
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
