Ralph Angenendt napsal(a): > Yes, I'm seeing that too: > > Even if that is changed to UTC, it still is May 13th (and it doesn't explain > why subsequent changelog entries are one day off, too. > > Ralph Thanks Ralph. Yes, it has nothing to do with time zone. I'm not sure if I've seen it before last rpmbuild update. DH _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: rpmbuild date shift
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: rpmbuild date shift
- From: David Hrbáč <hrbac.conf@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:09:49 +0200
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20090513111218.GF25005@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <4A0A9B79.3000001@xxxxxxxxx> <20090513111218.GF25005@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; cs; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090302 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666
- Follow-Ups:
- RPM date strangeness (was: rpmbuild date shift)
- From: Ralph Angenendt
- Re: rpmbuild date shift
- From: Ralph Angenendt
- RPM date strangeness (was: rpmbuild date shift)
- References:
- rpmbuild date shift
- From: David Hrbáč
- Re: rpmbuild date shift
- From: Ralph Angenendt
- rpmbuild date shift
- Prev by Date: Shell Script Pointers?
- Next by Date: Re: Calendar server
- Previous by thread: Re: rpmbuild date shift
- Next by thread: Re: rpmbuild date shift
- Index(es):
 |