Re: fs for > 16 TiB partition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:> On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 11:27:27AM +0200, Bent Terp wrote:>> We've got a 110 TB xfs system in production based on a logical volume>> striped over 9 boxes of SATA disk, works like a charm with great>> throughput as we stripe over 3 controllers :-)>>>> Are you running x86 32bit or x86_64 ?>> iirc there has been problems with XFS on 32bit kernel.. stack size related> or so? So 64bit has been the recommended way to go..
We run 64bit on most machines cuz they've got more than 4 gig ram.(And any besserwissers about to sound of about PAE kernels can kindlydo so in another thread cuz I'm NOT listening!)
As an aside, I hadn't heard of issues with 32bit xfs but in retrospectit can see the logic in it: a lot of company-supplied code has had64bit issues cuz it came from a 32bit environment, but SGI was never"most companies" :-)_______________________________________________CentOS mailing listCentOS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux