Re: fs for > 16 TiB partition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Adrian Sevcenco schrieb:
>> Hi,
>> What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB?
>> This is for an production server (that is, no ext4 recommendations
>> please :) )
>> What experiences did you had with your preferred FS ? (good and not so
>> good points)
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Adrian
>>   
> 
> 
> Does anybody actually run such a thing on Linux?
We will .. 2 X RAID6 each with 12 drives (24 drives machine)
with 2 TB drives .. that is 20 TBs each volume

> How long does a FSCK take once it's 80% populated?
i strongly hope that i will never know :))
it have 2 redundant PSU each on different ups ...

> How much RAM does that need?
minimal .. is an storage only machine so 4 GB is enough as the
connection is only GigE

> The FSCK on my Virtuozzo-partition takes long enough - and it's only 500
> GB or so.
Even for home its efficient to have an ups for each machine..

Adrian

<<attachment: smime.p7s>>

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux