John Doe a écrit : > > Couldn't it be the copy protection...? In theory, dd should also take care of copying the copy protection, isn't it? :o) _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Using cdrecord on CentOS
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Using cdrecord on CentOS
- From: Niki Kovacs <contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:30:22 +0200
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <390543.33428.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <49E1D52F.40800@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49E2435A.6030505@xxxxxxx> <49E5E52C.5070504@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <390543.33428.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090107)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Using cdrecord on CentOS
- From: John Doe
- Re: Using cdrecord on CentOS
- References:
- Using cdrecord on CentOS
- From: Niki Kovacs
- Re: Using cdrecord on CentOS
- From: Michael A. Peters
- Re: Using cdrecord on CentOS
- From: Niki Kovacs
- Re: Using cdrecord on CentOS
- From: John Doe
- Using cdrecord on CentOS
- Prev by Date: Re: Sharing RAM between VM
- Next by Date: Re: looking for alternative to SME & Clark Connect
- Previous by thread: Re: Using cdrecord on CentOS
- Next by thread: Re: Using cdrecord on CentOS
- Index(es):
 |